|
In
order to understand the fisheries issues of tomorrow, it is
necessary to know where anglers stand on the total complex of
coastal fisheries concerns, not just regulatory matters. Instead
of relying on anglers to surface issues for follow-up evaluation
purposes as we have done previously (Ditton
et al. 1998), it was proposed
that Coastal Fisheries personnel convene representatives from
other TPW divisions for purposes of having them identify the
coastal fisheries issues where angler feedback is desired. Thus
the objectives for this project are: 1) To identify the major
issues perceived by personnel from Coastal Fisheries and other
TPW divisions relevant to the management of coastal fisheries,
2) To develop valid and reliable survey questions that measure
angler attitudes regarding the diversity of issues identified in
Objective One, 3) To provide anglers with an opportunity to
provide open-ended comments on a volunteered basis regarding
issues of greatest concern to them, 4) To explore the managerial
implications of the data collected and to provide feedback to
management in support of future program planning and decision
making. The questionnaire is
being sent to those persons that responded to the most recent
statewide survey (Bohnsack
and Ditton, 1999). Of the 2,431
saltwater anglers that responded, questionnaires were mailed to
2,090 persons; the remaining respondents were reported as
undeliverable when the executive summary of the statewide survey
was mailed in the fall of 1999. Using the "Total Design Method"
(Salant and Dillman, 1994), we are expecting a response rate of
over 60%, which is consistent with previous response rates of
surveys performed by the Human Dimensions of Fisheries Research
Laboratory.
Whereas emphasis on policy questions in
previous statewide surveys have been mainly on regulatory
issues, a comprehensive range of issues that concern anglers and
agency personnel will be investigated in this project. The
questionnaire covers such topics as perceptions of bottom
scarring/prop scarring in Texas bays, where Texas saltwater
anglers receive their fishing information, water quality issues,
attitudes toward regulatory issues, and an investigation of
other outdoor activities in which saltwater anglers participate.
An interesting part of the data is that we will be able to link
answers on the current survey with their previous answers on the
statewide survey to further explore anglers' perceptions of
saltwater fishing on the Texas coast.
Once the data set is cleaned and
analyzed, a series of work sessions with TPW personnel will be
held to defuse the information collected and to discuss any
attitudinal differences between anglers and management personnel
in the selected issues areas.
Executive Summary
To assess the attitudes and opinions of
the state’s saltwater anglers regarding the current and future
management of marine fish species by Texas Parks and Wildlife (TPW),
we completed a mail survey of a random sample of licensed
resident anglers in Texas who fished in salt water in the
previous year. Topics included in the survey can be grouped
into the following broad categories: fishing participation,
location preferences, information sources, environmental
concerns, attitudes toward fisheries management practices, live
bait use and availability, red drum management and allocation
issues, motorboat access and impacts, participation in other
outdoor recreation activities and license purchase behavior
trends. Precision estimates for this study are based on the
number of usable returns (1,005). Thus, estimates of
proportions that approach .50 or 50% have a corresponding margin
of error of +/- 3.2%; for estimates around .1 or .9 (10% or 90%)
there is a corresponding margin of error of +/- 1.1%. The
percentages and the expanded estimates in this report are based
upon the estimated number of saltwater anglers in Texas (629,530
saltwater anglers).
| |
Surveys were mailed to
2,073 anglers. Responses were received from 1,102
anglers. Of this total, 1,005 were returned usable for
an effective response rate of 57%. |
| |
Anglers reported fishing
an average of 26.9 days (range = 0 to 310 days/year) in
the previous twelve months. More of their effort was
directed toward saltwater angling (19 days/year) than
freshwater angling (8 days/year). This is similar to
the number of days fished by saltwater anglers in
saltwater in 1995, when the average number of days
fishing in saltwater was 16 (Ditton, Bohnsack and Hunt
1998) and the number of days reported in the previous
statewide survey (18 saltwater days/year)(Bohnsack and
Ditton 1999). |
| |
The majority of days
fishing in saltwater was in the bay systems, either from
a boat (9 days/year) or from shore (5 days/year). Most
(68%) anglers reported fishing in the Gulf of Mexico
from 1 to 10 days in the previous twelve months, with an
average of 2 days/year fished from a boat and an average
of 2 days/year from the shore. Most (48%) anglers
reported they had fished about the same number of days
as the previous year; this pattern is not new. |
| |
A strong majority (85%)
of anglers reported that they did not travel outside of
Texas to participate in saltwater fishing. For those
that did travel elsewhere to fish in salt water, most
(77%, or about 73,000 anglers) fished between 1 and 5
days, with an average of 5 days/year. The majority of
those that fished out of state went to Louisiana (26%),
Florida (17%), Mexico (11%) and Alaska (8%). |
| |
The estimated number of
anglers that fished in bays during the previous twelve
months (495,629 anglers) fished mainly in two bays:
Galveston Bay (35%) and Aransas Bay (17%). |
| |
Most (60%) anglers
accessed the Gulf through three communities: Galveston,
Port Aransas and Rockport. |
| |
A plurality of anglers
reported spending one or more days surf fishing on a
Gulf Beach (41%) followed by fishing offshore oil/gas
platforms (33%). Our results indicated relatively small
percentages of saltwater anglers participating in fly
fishing and speargun fishing while scuba diving. |
| |
A strong majority (82%)of
anglers reported they were “Moderately Satisfied” or
“Very Satisfied” with saltwater fishing in Texas. The
percent of anglers in the “Very Satisfied” and
“Extremely Satisfied” category (46%) has decreased since
the last statewide survey, when 56% of saltwater anglers
reported they were “Very Satisfied” to “Extremely
Satisfied” (Bohnsack and Ditton 1999). |
| |
A plurality (65%) of
saltwater anglers indicated they did not subscribe to
any fishing or boating magazine. A majority (72%) of
Texas saltwater anglers reported they had Internet
access. Almost two-thirds (60%) of Texas saltwater
anglers also reported that they would be interested in
receiving a weekly fishing report from TPW via e-mail.
However, at this point in time, slightly less than
one-half (47%) reported they were willing to buy fishing
licenses over the Internet. Most anglers report they
make use of newspaper columns and articles (33%) or
their local bait or tackle shop (32%) as a source of
fishing information. |
| |
Most anglers (58%)
reported they have not seen any bottom scarring/prop
scarring in Texas waters. When asked what management
option they prefer if bottom scarring/prop scarring was
determined to be a problem in the area they fish most
often, the option of increasing education efforts and
monitoring the situation was the most preferred (50%),
with a requirement for no motoring outside of marked
boating lanes being the second most preferred (28%). |
| |
Most anglers agreed with
the following statements: “the fish I catch in Texas
waters are safe to eat” (86%), “pollution in saltwater
bays is increasing” (64%), “TPW should temporarily close
certain bays, estuaries, or grass flats when they are
susceptible to damage” (57%), “red drum (redfish)
populations are increasing” (62%) and “spotted seatrout
populations are increasing” (53%). |
| |
When asked to report how
a red tide or public health fishing advisory would alter
their fishing plans, most anglers reported they would
choose an alternate location along the Texas coast to go
saltwater fishing (49%), or cancel their trip (25%). We
also asked anglers if they had been affected by a red
tide event or public health fishing advisory; most (90%)
had not. |
| |
The majority of Texas
saltwater anglers preferred rig jackets, decks or other
oil production structures, concrete culverts and clay
pipes, or blocks made of concrete for future artificial
reef construction. |
| |
Most (66%) saltwater
anglers in Texas reported that they had not been checked
by a game warden “since this time last year.” Among
those that were checked, the vast majority (97%)
indicated that they were treated in a courteous and
professional manner. |
| |
Most anglers reported
their closest fishing companions always or almost always
supported and abided by TPW fishing regulations, tried
to prevent damage to seagrass from their boat motors and
abided by TPW licensing requirements when fishing in
saltwater. Likewise, most reported their fishing
companions never or almost never “fudge a bit” when
measuring the fish they catch, take two limits in a
single day or exceed daily bag limits. About one-half
of the anglers said their closest fishing companions
sometimes practice catch and release and sometimes
release all the fish they catch. |
| |
Most (84%) anglers
disagree with the statements “I don’t like to eat the
fish I usually catch,” (84%) and “I can’t always
identify the types of fish I catch” (52%). Statements
where the majority of anglers reported agreement
included: “The overall cost of fishing is too high”
(57%), “The differences between State and Federal
fishing regulations are sometimes confusing” (54%) and
“Fishing licenses are too expensive” (52%). |
| |
Most anglers agreed with
the following statements regarding various issues
concerning licensing and stamps: “TPW should continue to
require a saltwater stamp in addition to a general
license to support saltwater fisheries management and
law enforcement” (70%), “The saltwater stamp is well
worth it in terms of the benefits I receive from
saltwater fishing” (65%) and “Anglers should purchase a
saltwater stamp in addition to a general license to
support saltwater fisheries management and law
enforcement” (62%). There was strong support for a
different sort of temporary license than is currently
available: “TPW should offer a 1-day fishing license
that will let an individual fish in either saltwater (no
saltwater stamp required) or freshwater” (71%). |
| |
A central concern of
personnel in the TPW Coastal Fisheries Branch when the
survey was being conducted was the proposed increase in
saltwater stamp costs to fund the buyback portion of the
Shrimp, Crab and Finfish Limited Entry Program.
Overall, there was strong support among anglers for this
idea. About two thirds of the anglers supported the
proposed license increase at the following three levels:
$1 level (70%), $2 level (64%) and $3 level (64%). |
| |
When asked if they used
live fish as bait for saltwater fishing, most (73%)
Texas saltwater anglers responded in the affirmative.
Most (69%, or about 314,000 anglers) of these anglers
responded that they used live fish as bait for 1 to 10
days of their total saltwater fishing days, with an
average of 13.31 days. When asked about the
availability, cost and quality of live fish as bait,
most anglers agreed with the following two statements:
“The cost of the live fish I buy for saltwater fishing
is too high” (65%) and “The quality of the live fish I
buy for saltwater fishing is good” (66%). |
| |
Most (76%) anglers
reported they used live shrimp as bait while fishing.
Again, most (70%, or about 333,000 anglers) of the
anglers that used live shrimp as bait reported doing so
from 1 to 10 days during the year. When asked about the
availability, cost and quality of live shrimp they use
for bait, most anglers agreed with the following
statements: “The cost of the live shrimp I buy for
saltwater fishing is too high” (69%) and “The quality of
the live shrimp I buy for saltwater fishing is good”
(68%). |
| |
Most anglers (69%)
support or strongly support the current regulations for
red drum. Slightly less than one-half (47%) opposed the
release of all red drum caught over 28 inches in
length. Also, less than a majority (47%) of anglers
opposed a daily bag limit of one red drum over 28 inches
per day. Angler feelings toward increasing the maximum
size limit from 28 inches to 30 inches received nearly
an equal proportion of support (40%) and opposition
(35%). When asked which management option they most
prefer, most (44%) reported preferring what they know
best, the current regulations. |
| |
Most surprising is the
percent of saltwater anglers (60%) that reported fishing
specifically for red drum during the past year. This is
8 percentage points more than the proportion of anglers
(52%) that reported fishing specifically for red drum in
1995 (Ditton et al. 1998). However, the number of
anglers that have used their “red drum trophy tag”
during the past year (12%) has remained about the same
as it was in 1995 (12%)(Ditton et al. 1998). Of those
anglers that used the “red drum trophy tag,” 30%, or
approximately 22,000 anglers, reported sending it in to
receive a “bonus tag”; 36% of these anglers, or about
8,000 anglers, reported they actually used the “bonus
tag.” |
| |
Most (59%) anglers
reported there was another outdoor recreational activity
that could provide the same satisfaction as fishing. Of
the activities anglers reported, freshwater fishing,
hunting, camping and golf were reported most often.
When asked what their most important outdoor
recreational activities were besides saltwater fishing,
the greatest proportion of anglers reported hunting,
freshwater fishing, camping, or golf. |
| |
Most (80%) anglers
reported they had not started participating in any new
outdoor recreational activities over the past 12
months. Of those anglers that indicated they had done
so, the most popular were golf, camping,
canoeing/kayaking and hunting. |
| |
We asked Texas saltwater
anglers to indicate their satisfaction with TPW on a
five-point scale. Most (64%) anglers were “Very or
Extremely satisfied”, with only 7% of anglers being “Not
at all or Slightly satisfied”. |
|
|