Braunig Lake
and
Calaveras Lake
are within twenty miles of
San
Antonio. These two reservoirs
are used heavily for outdoor recreation by the population of one
of the ten largest cities in the United States. Built in 1964,
Braunig is a 1,350 acre lake and is the closer of the two to San
Antonio. Calaveras Lake was built in 1969 and is the larger of
the two lakes (3.450 acres). Both lakes were built by the
City Public Service (CPS) Board of San Antonio
ostensibly for power plant cooling purposes. The
San Antonio River Authority
(SARA) provides public access, infrastructure, and recreational
facilities by special agreement with CPS. The fishery resources
in both reservoirs are more diverse than most other freshwater
impoundments in Texas:
catfish,
hybrid striped bass,
largemouth bass,
orangemouth
corvina, and
red drum
have all been stocked into these lakes in the past.
This study is being undertaken through a cooperative effort
between the
Human Dimensions of Fisheries Laboratory
at Texas A&M University, CPS, SARA, and the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
(TPWD). The purpose of the study is to learn more about the
people who fish at these reservoirs in order to improve the
ability of lake and fisheries managers to be responsive to the
needs and desires of their angling clientele. The survey has
three main objectives. First, we seek to gain a market
perspective on Braunig and Calaveras anglers to understand their
social and economic characteristics, fishing participation, and
level of involvement in recreational fishing. We will also
collect information about anglers' attitudes and opinions
regarding fisheries management measures at the lakes. Secondly,
the study will collect data on angler expenditures to provide
estimates of the economic impact of fishing at
Braunig Lake
and
Calaveras Lake
on
Bexar County.
Finally, we seek to better understand the extent to which
anglers value their fishing experiences and how this translates
into their willingness to pay for improved facilities and
services at the lakes.
The sampling frame for this study will include anglers at both
lakes using public boat ramps and public fishing areas. The
sample will be stratified by lake as well as by boat versus
shore based anglers. This design will allow for meaningful
comparisons between anglers at the different lakes as well as
between anglers who fish from boats and those who fish from the
shoreline. Anglers fishing in these lakes will be sampled as
part of ongoing TPWD creel survey intercept program.
Approximately 1,500 anglers will be asked to complete and return
questionnaires they will receive by mail within three months of
their contact at the lake by TPWD personnel. The study began on
June 1, 1999 and will conclude on December 31, 2000.
Executive Summary
A self-administered mail questionnaire
was used to collect information from Braunig and Calaveras
anglers regarding their demographic characteristics, fishing
participation, attitudes, experience preferences, opinions on
management tools, willingness to pay increased costs to fish at
the lakes, and substitutes for Braunig and Calaveras. The
survey was sent to 1,028 anglers sampled from Braunig and
Calaveras between April 1, 1999 and March 31, 2000. A total of
437 usable questionnaires were returned. After non-deliverables
were eliminated, the effective response rate was 46.3%. A
telephone follow-up of non-respondents suggests that the data
over represent more experienced and avid anglers. This should
be taken into consideration when viewing and using the results
of this study. Few significant differences were found between
Braunig and Calaveras anglers on survey variables; however,
numerous differences were found between boat anglers and shore
anglers for both lakes combined, suggesting that there are two
distinct angler populations at these lakes.
Angler Demographics
| |
Most (97%) Braunig and
Calaveras anglers were male. |
| |
Average age was 48 years
for boat anglers and 44 years for shore anglers. |
| |
Most (77%) boat anglers
were white; 54% of shore anglers were non-white. |
| |
Forty three percent of
boat anglers and 58% of shore anglers were Hispanic. |
| |
Median household income
was $45,000 for boat anglers and $35,000 for shore
anglers. |
| |
Most (87%) anglers
reported residing within Bexar County. |
General Fishing Participation
| |
Average number of days
fished during the past 12 months was 46 days for boat
anglers and 32 days for shore anglers. When adjusted
for non-response, average number of days fished
during the past 12 months was 35 days for boat anglers
and 27 days for shore anglers. |
| |
Average experience
fishing in freshwater was 34 years for boat anglers and
27 years for shore anglers. |
| |
Eighty eight percent of
boat anglers and 76% of shore anglers reported having a
preferred species to catch when fishing in freshwater. |
| |
The most preferred
species for boat anglers when fishing in freshwater were
red drum (35%), largemouth bass (33%), and hybrid
striped bass (16%). |
| |
The most preferred
species for shore anglers when fishing in freshwater
were largemouth bass (32%), red drum (30%), and catfish
(26%). |
| |
Most (72%) Braunig and
Calaveras anglers reported that fishing is their most
important outdoor activity. |
| |
Statements about fishing
in freshwater receiving the highest level of agreement
from boat anglers were “I like to fish where there are
several types of fish to catch” (85%), “The more fish I
catch, the happier I am”(73%), and “A fishing trip can
be successful even if no fish are caught” (73%). |
| |
Statements about fishing
in freshwater receiving the highest level of agreement
from shore anglers were “I like to fish where there are
several types of fish to catch” (87%), “I usually eat
the fish I catch”(72%), and “A fishing trip can be
successful even if no fish are caught” (72%). |
| |
Statements about fishing
in freshwater receiving the highest level of
disagreement from boat anglers were “I want to keep all
the fish I catch” (79%), “If I thought I wouldn’t catch
any fish, I wouldn’t go fishing” (57%), and “When I go
fishing, I am not satisfied unless I catch at least
something” (50%). |
| |
Statements about fishing
in freshwater receiving the highest level of
disagreement from shore anglers were “I want to keep all
the fish I catch” (62%), “If I thought I wouldn’t catch
any fish, I wouldn’t go fishing” (61%), and “When I go
fishing, I am not satisfied unless I catch at least
something” (47%). |
| |
Sixty four percent of
boat anglers and 71% of shore anglers said there are
factors that prevent them from fishing as often as they
would like. |
| |
Statements about
constraints on fishing participation receiving the
highest level of agreement from boat anglers were “I
don’t have to catch fish for food” (66%), “I have too
many work/family commitments” (61%), and “Fishing
facilities and areas are too crowded” (35%). |
| |
Statements about
constraints on fishing participation receiving the
highest level of agreement from shore anglers were “I
don’t have to catch fish for food” (65%), “I have too
many work/family commitments” (56%), and “Fishing
facilities and areas are too crowded” (48%). |
Participation and Attitudes Regarding Fishing at Braunig and
Calaveras
| |
Boat and shore anglers
reported fishing an average of 18 days and 15 days,
respectively, over the previous 12 months at the lake
where they were intercepted. |
| |
Ninety two percent of
boat anglers and 80% of shore anglers have a preferred
species at the lake where they were intercepted. |
| |
Species most preferred by
boat anglers were red drum (40%), largemouth bass (27%),
and hybrid striped bass (20%). |
| |
Species most preferred by
shore anglers were red drum (38%), catfish (25%), and
largemouth bass (23%). |
| |
Species caught most often
by boat anglers were hybrid striped bass (34%), catfish
(31%), and red drum (19%). |
| |
Species caught most often
by shore anglers were catfish (60%), hybrid striped bass
(11%), and red drum (11%). |
| |
A minority of anglers
were moderately satisfied with the quality of the
fishing (46%) and the quality of the facilities (34%) at
Braunig and Calaveras. |
| |
When asked who they fish
with most often at Braunig or Calaveras, boat anglers
reported friends (29%), family and friends together
(27%), alone (25%), and with family (19%). |
| |
When asked who they fish
with most often at Braunig or Calaveras, shore anglers
reported family and friends together (32%), family
(29%), alone (24%), and with friends (15%). |
| |
The highest rated motives
for fishing at Braunig and Calaveras were “For
relaxation”, “For the fun of catching fish”, and “To be
outdoors” which were rated as important or extremely
important by 86%, 85%, and 80% of boat anglers,
respectively, and 86%, 82%, and 80% of shore anglers,
respectively. |
| |
More than 77% of boat
anglers and 63% of shore anglers said they support
current regulations for red drum, largemouth bass,
hybrid striped bass, and catfish at Braunig and
Calaveras. |
Trip Characteristics
| |
Average distance traveled
to get to Braunig or Calaveras was 23 miles. |
| |
Statements about the most
recent trip to Braunig or Calaveras receiving the
highest level of agreement from boat anglers were “The
facilities I encountered met my needs on this trip”
(71%), “I thoroughly enjoyed this trip” (67%), and “I
would like to fish more lakes like this one” (62%). |
| |
Statements about the most
recent trip to Braunig or Calaveras receiving the
highest level of agreement from shore anglers were “I
thoroughly enjoyed this trip” (74%), “This trip was well
worth the money spent to take this trip” (58%), and “I
would like to fish more lakes like this one” (58%).
|
| |
Statements about the most
recent trip to Braunig and Calaveras receiving the
highest level of disagreement by boat anglers were “I
caught what I consider to be a trophy fish on this trip”
(85%), “I caught more fish than I expected on this trip”
(68%), and “I cannot imagine a better fishing trip”
(65%). |
| |
Statements about the most
recent trip to Braunig and Calaveras receiving the
highest level of disagreement by shore anglers were “I
caught what I consider to be a trophy fish on this trip”
(86%), “I caught more fish than I expected on this trip”
(68%), and “My fishing skills were tested on this trip”
(52%). |
| |
Total yearly estimated
expenditures made within Bexar County by Braunig anglers
was $3,492,735 and $280,737 for Bexar County residents
and for individuals who reside outside Bexar County,
respectively. |
| |
Total yearly estimated
expenditures made within Bexar County by Calaveras
anglers was $2,499,648 and $640,106 for Bexar County
residents and for individuals who reside outside Bexar
County, respectively. |
| |
Economic impact analysis
was not performed on these expenditure estimates due to
the low number of out-of-county anglers sampled at each
lake and the low total expenditures for this group. |
Substitutes for Braunig and Calaveras
| |
Most boat anglers said
the Texas coast (60%), Choke Canyon Reservoir (59%), and
Canyon Lake (50%) would be acceptable substitutes for
Braunig Lake or Calaveras Lake. |
| |
The Texas coast was the
only alternative location considered an acceptable
location by a majority (69%) of shore anglers. |
| |
Anglers who said
alternative locations were not acceptable substitutes
for Braunig and Calaveras said so typically because
these locations are too far away (Medina Lake, Corpus
Christi Lake, Choke Canyon Reservoir, Canyon Lake, Texas
coast), the same types of fish cannot be caught there
(Medina Lake, Brackenridge Park, Canyon Lake), they are
too crowded (Brackenridge Park, Canyon Lake), a boat is
needed to fish there (Medina Lake), or they are too
expensive (Texas Coast). |
Willingness to Pay Increased Entry Fees
| |
With no change in fishing
quality at Braunig or Calaveras, the probability of a
respondent agreeing to pay a higher entrance fee was
negatively correlated with the hypothetical fee and
positively correlated with overall satisfaction level
with the fishing quality there. |
| |
At both lakes, revenue is
predicted to be maximized at a daily fee of around $5. |
| |
Raising the entrance fee
to $5 would result in the displacement of approximately
1,016 anglers from Braunig Lake and 1 ,067 anglers from
Calaveras Lake. |
Conclusions
| |
Braunig Lake and
Calaveras Lake provide important fishing and outdoor
recreation opportunities to residents of San Antonio and
Bexar County that are not available from other local
sources. |
| |
Boat and shore angler
appear to represent two different angler segments at
Braunig and Calaveras. Differences between boat and
shore anglers need to be considered in management
decision-making at these lakes. |
| |
Successful management of
these lakes will depend on providing a diversity of
opportunities in terms of species available, access,
facilities, and for participation in other types of
activities at the lakes. |
| |
When deciding whether to
raise fees, managers must weigh the need for increased
revenue against the number of anglers expected to be
displaced. If the entrance fee is to be increased,
managers must emphasize the need for a concurrent
increase in the quality of the fishing or facilities at
the lakes. |
| |
Due to the small number
of non-locals fishing at Braunig and Calaveras, direct
economic impact of fishing at these lakes on Bexar
County could not be estimated. Because these lakes are
used primarily by Bexar County residents, this economic
impact is expected to be minimal. |
| |
Results of this study
provide unique insights into the motivations, attitudes,
preferences, fishing behaviors, and socio-demographic
characteristics of Hispanic and urban anglers. The
information presented in this report should prove useful
to agency decision makers as they anticipate future
state-level changes in demographics and changes in the
composition of the angler population. |
|

|