Characteristics, Behavior, Attitudes, Expenditures, Harvest and Management Preferences of Billfish Tournament Anglers

Robert B. Ditton and Mark R Fisher

A mail survey of 1,984 billfish anglers was completed in 1989-1990. Because no listing of billfish anglers is available for sampling purposes, we focused all research efforts on a known population of tournament billfish anglers. From among 359 tournaments held in the U.S. western Atlantic Ocean we sampled 27 tournaments. Tournament officials from these events were contacted to solicit their cooperation and access to the names and addresses of participants. A total of 1,171 anglers responded to the mail survey for a response rate of 59%. When non-deliverables were excluded, the effective response rate was 62%. This research was initiated in response to social and economic research needs identified in the billfish FMP and in support of billfish conservation measures at home and abroad.

Major research findings are listed under five headings:

Characteristics of Billfish Tournament Anglers
 

Almost all billfish anglers were male. The mean age level was 46. Most indicated they were employed in white collar positions with well above average education levels.

 

The median income category of billfish tournament anglers was $110,000 to $119,000. Almost 50% reported earning more than $130,000.

 

Over one-half of the billfish tournament anglers reported fishing 21 or more years. A majority of anglers reported fishing for billfish 11 or more years.

 

Billfish tournament anglers spent an average of 44 days fishing in the previous 12 months, considerably higher than for salt water anglers in general.

 

Billfish tournament anglers preferred blue marlin, white marlin and sailfish, respectively.

Angler Opinions on Fisheries Management Options
 

Billfish tournament anglers were opposed to smaller minimum sizes for billfish, no minimum sizes for fish to be mounted by taxidermists, banning double hooks, allowing handlining or harpooning for recreational purposes, banning "live baiting', a one billfish per boat per day bag limit and area closures.

 

They supported larger minimum sizes for billfish, larger minimums for tournaments, mandatory "no kill" tournaments, a one billfish per angler per day bag limit, a billfish stamp and a zero bag limit.

 

Anglers were evenly divided on banning stainless steel hooks and seasonal closures for the fishery.

Billfish Fishing Trips
 

Billfish tournament anglers reported an average of 13 billfish trips per year with each trip lasting an average of 2. 7 days.

 

On the average, each angler kept one billfish per year. However 29% of the billfish tournament angler population accounted for 100% of the billfish mortality.

 

Mid-Atlantic billfish tournament anglers were the most successful in catching billfish and released the most billfish. Gulf of Mexico anglers made the fewest trips per year and were the least successful. Caribbean anglers made the most billfish trips per year and killed the most billfish.

Economic Value of the Recreational Billfish Fishery
 

On their last billfish trips (2.59 days), anglers spent an average of $2,147 including tournament fees.

 

Billfish tournament anglers were willing to pay an additional average price of over $200 (consumer surplus) above and beyond their total trip expenditures for the opportunity to catch billfish and would probably be willing to pay more if billfish abundance were to increase.

Population Projections of Harvest and Expenditures
 

An estimated 7,195 billfish tournament anglers in the study region made a total of 102,895 + 6,512 billfish fishing trips. Forty percent of these trips were successful in that at least one billfish was caught. This group boated 50,373 billfish and killed 5,541 + 715 billfish. The total catch (boated) was 38% sailfish, 33% blue marlin, 29~o white marlin and <1% spearfish.

 

Billfish tournament anglers in the study region spent $164,735,000 in pursuit of billfish excluding tournament fees. This amounts to $3,310 per billfish caught or $29,730 per billfish killed. Tournaments generated a total expenditure of $58,964,000 of which $14,690,000 were tournament fees. This amounts to $43,565 for every tournament-killed billfish.

Acknowledgements

The completion of this project was made possible by the efforts of many individuals who deserve special mention. At Texas A&M University, Brian Fiske performed many valuable functions including sample selection, survey administration, coding, data entry and assisted with report preparation. Jodie Bell, Kristen Dennard and Leslie Dennard also assisted with coding and data entry. We appreciate their support and careful work. Dr. Tony Fedler, formerly with the University of Maryland and now affiliated with the Sport Fishing Institute in Washington, D.C., provided his services as a consultant. We are appreciative of the opportunity to complete this research project for the Billfish Foundation. The support, assistance and encouragement by Monty Lopez and John Spence is acknowledged. It would have been impossible for us to complete this study without the cooperation of billfish tournament officials. We thank each tournament director who provided names of billfish anglers for survey purposes. We would also like to thank the billfish anglers who took the time to respond to our survey.

RBD

MRF